Home > Legal Discussion Forums > Labour / Employee Related Laws

Sec.25B of Industrial Disputes Act

AviKiran - Member Since: Sep 2011
Subject - Sec.25B of Industrial Disputes Act
S.25-F IDA, 240 days - in the preceding year OR in any year/s during service tenure ??

1) A workman who has put in more than 240 days during first five years of his service BUT has worked for less than 240 days during in the 6th and 7th year due to his absenteeism. [Exemption u/s 25B(2)(b)Explanation i,ii,iii and iv is not attracted]{no disciplinary action against absenteeism has been taken}
Thus he has worked for less than 240 days during the year(s) preceding to his termination.
Whether the employer can straight way terminate his services? Or the protection provided by Sec.25-F of Industrial Disputes Act is available to the workman and the employer has to pay Retrenchment Compensation, Notice Pay etc.and observe procedure u/s 25-F.
2) In case, payment of R.C. is obligatory, whether to be paid only for the years in which he has served for more than 240 days or for all seven years ?

Please refer Bombay H.C. and Supreme Court Judgements, if any, on this point.

 


Topic Categories >> disciplinary action ° retrenchment ° supreme court judgements °

More replies may exists. Please Login To View All Replies (Forgot Password?) (Enroll & Register)
User Name: Password:

CiteLegal is a community KnowledgeBase available to everyone at no cost.


Sponsor Cite.CO - Contact Us - CiteLegal Index - Privacy Statement - Top - RSS    

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms Of Service