Thank you very much Mr. Vadia sir,for your information the bank has kept me still under suspension though the Joint Registrar court, stay the order of suspension,(2004) the management has appealed before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal (W P ) with a requisition not allow the employee to work in the bank as earlier since her presence will cause/damage important documents of the bank and also the suspension is not a punishment and at the same time she been paid with subsistence allowance ,by considering the plea, the honorable KAT Court allowed the same. later the case returned to the Joint Registrar;s court, here as per the bank allegations the bank has not produced any valid(Documents) papers, On repeated requests too, where it took almost 15 months and the court passed orders in my favor with an order (2006) - The Bank management is at liberty to conduct the inquiry,if at all in any case the bank has incurred any loss due to the act of the employee and by the inquiry of the bank, if the employee is not awarded Justice,the employee is at liberty to take the shelter under law. After this the bank started the inquiry by appointing an ex employee (CEO Y N Laxmi prasad) of the bank ,who has attended the court on behalf of the bank in joint Registrars court against me,for which i raised a serious question before the Joint Registrar about his appointment which will vitiate the inquiry & not justifiable, then the registrar has quashed the appointment of the Inquiry officer and directed the bank to appoint the right EO in place of ex- employee, The order of the JR was followed by the bank by appointing one more new EO advocate vykuntaswamy, the learned counsel started the inquiry in English and issued a documents list and as per that list,some documents were not issued to me in spite of several repeated requests, he tried to manage the inquiry nearly 8 sittings.After this situation i appealed in writing to conduct the inquiry in state administrative language ie.Kannada for which he demanded me Rs.5000/- per sitting(this was exposed in writing in inquiry procedure sheet ) for the demand of the EO i did not agree. after this the EO conducted inquiry sittings and in the procedure sheet the officer started writing that the employee (myself) is not co-operating in the inquiry ,for which i did not agree with his findings i started writing my clear cut opinion after the inquiry in the Inquiry procedure sheet itself and affix my signature ,for which the honorable EO raised serious objections.After writing the happenings of the inquiry, in the procedures ,2 to 3 sittings continued and stopped the inquiry(half done) with no proper intimation,& prolonged the inquiry for no reason upto 2013, and now the bank management has started the Inquiry on me after a lapse of nearly 10 years and from 2004 i been paid a subsistence allowance o f 50% of my salary and till today they are paying the same and not according to change of DA from time to time for which i written several letters of request to pay the allowance as per rules ,but my request is in vain. with reference to the above problem of mine i have contacted many advocates including the retd judges etc., everybody wonders and say its a peculiar and fit case of harassment and it is nothing but a legal terrorism, So have decided to fight legally, ,just because, am prompt and truthful in my works and not co-operated to any type of illegal activities of the bank, in order to tune and mend me to their requirement the management has taken lots of illegal steps against me. Kindly help by giving me legal suggestions to overcome this legal terrorism and help all others who are not able to rise their voice legally .
5th January 2014 From India,